Pages

My occasional thoughts about the damn addictive contest, which usually come around the sacred month of May.

Saturday, May 7, 2011

So why do some people become Eurovision fans? Part 2 of the mystery

Read the first part of this article here!

I'm going to open this part with two personal Eurovision-experiences of mine, that would serve as an example for my final Eurovision fandom-theory.

The year was 2006. It was the first time I went to Eurovision, In Athens, Greece. And I was standing in the middle of the press room, with a microphone in my hand, interviewing Andreas Lundstedt from Alcazar. In front of us were many photographers and journalists with video cameras, and they were filming and taking pictures of...us! Of me talking with Andreas. I felt like I'm in the seventh heaven. That I finally did that, I've achieved what everybody wants and craves for: to meet famouse people and be in the spotlight, in the place where everything happens.

Except that it was only an illusion. I was not really a journalist. I only got a press-accreditation because I took part in a temporary project of doing a video-blog for Eurovision. When I came back to Israel after the Eurovision ended, no glorious job waited for me, only usual exams at the university, and overload of tasks that accumulated because I went abroad in the middle of the most study-loaded perioud of the school year. And still, when I stood there in the venue in Athens, I felt like it was real. As if little me was really an important person who deserves these cameras and shootings. It was like I got the chance to jump into the future, or to another galaxy, and see what it feels like, to be someone who DOES usually interfer with such glamorous things.

The second Eurovision episode I want to tell about also took part in Athens. There was a cruise for journalists and Eurovision artists and I had the chance to join. The atmosphere on the ship was heavenly. There was food, music, cold breeze and fans from all over the world. And one moment just was engraved in my memory. I remember passing by a group of fans singing Linda Bengtzing's 'Alla flickor" from melodifestivalen. I remember I naturally joined them in singing, without even thinking. A wonderful feeling of being a part of a bigger thing suddenly swept over me. Singing with them felt like we were all a big Eurovision family. It was amazing, to see how you can suddenly form a strong emotional connection with people you've never met and never heard of before. How strangers can suddenly become your friends and soul-mates only because you all love the same thing and  are familiar with the same rare musical style.

But this, too, was an illusion. They were not really my friends, and they were surely not soul-mates or "spirtualy family". Friends are people you meet on a regular basis and know to depth. Friendship is something you build and nurture, and it has also ups and downs, after you get to know your friends' bad habits and detested quialities. It's not so hard, to immidiately like people from other culture, that you "earned" automaticly because of Eurovision, and who always seem nice, simply because you don't know how anger and unfriendliness is expressed according to them. It's also not so hard to like those friends, that you meet only once in a year and therefore never fight with them and never get to know their unpleasant every-day sides.

Eurovision is the event of illusion. It gives you things for free, and you don't need to make any effort. Just be a fan and be a part. And it starts way before the happy day in which you go on your first Eurovision trip. It starts when you watch the contest for the first time, when you are a kid. The show itself is a bundle of illusions, but we'll get there later.

As I noticed this strong theme of illusion in Eurovision, I tried to think: what kind of people would regard this illusion so attractive? What people would like the idea of instant fame, instant friends, instant national pride, instant attention that's directed to you, and so on? And then I remembered all those American films, showing this unpopular boy who's laughed at  at school and is never invited to parties. And as his class-mates inflict him with the final torture, he's shouting at them: "You'll see! I'll show all of you! One day I'll be famous and you'll all be sorry!!!"

What am I trying to say by this? That we, Eurovisin fans, are all not-so-popular kids who want a revange? Not necessarily. But a person who wants it big and instant, just HAS to be a person who lacked something as a kid. Only someone who's never had something, would want to have it so desperately when he's an adult, or even earlier in life. Now he wants it bigger than ever, and he wants it now.

And how does he get all this by being a Eurovision fan? Let's form an example.

I'll call him Peter, as a tribute to Finland's entry. Peter is nine. Or eight or seven or so. He may be a very introverted kid who's never been noticed at school and has no friends, even though he's quite smart. He can, alternatively, also be a kid who's over-praised at home for his talents and looks, but then naturally doesn't get the same amount of attention at school and it frustrates him. Or he can also be gay, who's learned from his surroundings that one should be straight and love football and not barbie dolls, and therefore he's afraid to show his "gayness" so he's becoming very quiet and shy. There can be many kinds of Peters, but they all have one thing in common: Peter has never had the chance to express himself and be someone. Peter does not have a self-image. A self image is one of the most basic needs of a human being.

One evening in May Peter is watching a program called the Eurovision Song Contest in his family's living room. He's becoming completely enchanted and can't take his eyes off the screen. Years later he would tell his fellow Eurovision fans about this first time, and about all the "beautiful songs, music, dances, festivity, so many languages..." and so on that captured him and made him a fan. Yeah, Peter thinks that this was what made him love Eurovision. He just love music, and also likes languages and other cultures. but is it really so?

Together with Peter there are millions of people who are music lovers and are watching the contest, but find nothing special in it, except for the usual "support your country" thing. But Peter did find something special in it. He found himself. He saw a contest where every song is just shouting out loud: "This is me!!! watch me!!!! now!!!". He saw songs which are so catchy and easily-remembered, that just capture your ear from the very first second of their opening. He saw shiny sequinsed outfits, colourful dresses and strange folk-custums. He heard strange languages that he's never heard before. He saw women who are not the usual feminine pop-star material but are strong dominant divas who sing power-ballads, or alternatively perform an up-beat songs with such grace and charisma in their moves that it looks like they, and not men, rule the world. He also saw men sing and perform, but they were not the usual men in suits. They were men who wore colours and danced gracefully with their flexible bodies even better than woman. They looked like great peacocks, showing off their questionable sexuality.

And he saw even more. He saw acceptance. He saw that those singers represent their countries. They were chosen, from all the rest. They are a source of pride. Even though they may be strange, over extraverted, and have so-called opposite sexual behaviour, they were chosen to be the representing face and body of their country. Already now Peter is forming in his mind the dream he would be able to express in words only years later: He wants to represent his country in Eurovision. This is the most desired stamp one can have on himself in order to prove that he is accepted as he is.

And finally, when the show was about to end, Peter saw a final desire coming into satisfaction: The contest had a winner. Someone, probably the one who was the best, was crowned and awarded a prise and a big honour. It was a reasuring thing, to see that it's so simple: the one who's the best gets what he deserves, and the ones who are less successful are ranked below in downward order.

So that was what Peter saw: Self-expression. Acceptance. Justice. Three things he needed so badly in his daily life, where he was constantly backstage, casted away, lonely, hidden or uninvited. Many people watched the contest together with Peter all around the world, but they saw only strange old-fashioned songs, unlike the ones they like to hear on the radio, a long tiring voting process, and a cocky winner with too much show-off who won over better "normal" songs.

And it's not the end of the story. Peter is about to grow up and discover, to his great surprise and happiness, that there were other people like him, who happened to find something in this far-flung contest who anyone think is strange and unnacessary. And then a very interesting interaction is about to take place. As I said, there are many kinds and forms of Peters, all of them needing attention and self-expression due to different reasons. Remember the "gays & divas" theory? two personality types of different fans? So here I'm gonna base myself upon that elementary scheme and claim that there are two ways of dealing with this need for attention described above.

Those Peters, or Eurovision fans, grow up at some time. Most of them are already not the frustrated kid they were. They've learned to express themselves and blend in their surrounding society to some degree. Maybe it was Eurovision that helped them and gave them the inspiration for self-building, through singing the songs, following a yearly event, having dreams and desires, and so on. I think there are two types of ways of overcoming this childhood lack of attention. One is over-extraversion. I chose this term insted of  the former "diva" term, which is not appropriate anymore, because not all compensation-behaviours have a feminine queen element. So some fans are becoming some sort of a Eurovision artist-personality, only without the singing thing (or sometimes with it too). They dress differently in an attention-seeking way, they talk a lot about themselves, they demand compliments, either by saying "I'm so damn pretty" or alternatively "damn, I'm so ugly". Some of them are also fighting a lot and becoming rude or over-criticizing. Some develope an annoying sense of humor, and so on. As I said, There are many ways of standing out. Some of them are attractive and acceptable, and some of them are clearly not. Some are productive, some are not. But all are attention-achieving in some way.

The other way of coming over the lack of attention and self-expression is what I call extreme-fandom. You know those very commited fans who know all the songs from all the years and everything? Or are fanatic admirers of some Eurovision artist and follow him obsessively? They are usually quiet persons, very nice and polite, who don't dance like crazy at the Eurovision parties or post millions of pictures on facebook. I think they just chose to use their love for Eurovision as meaning of expressing their wish of getting attention or standing-out. Instead of being a star, they are satisfied with watching other stars perform and admiring others who express this huge need to shout "look at me, here I am". As they grow up and develope, they choose to work at the back of the show buisness, as producers, journalists, helpers...anything that surrounds the star istelf. I still don't understand why some people become colourful characters and some chose to stay as they are and just project their needs and wishes on some other figures. But I'm open to suggestions.

There's also a third way of expressing oneself, and it's a somewhat combination of the two ways described above. I've met several fans who are very extraverted and at the same time praise obsessively other Eurovision figures. There are not so many who are like that, because the extraverted are usually too self-centered, and the admirers are usually extremely ignoring all elements of themselves and direct all their energy towards others. But They still exist. Those people are somewhat more problematic in relationships with other people, because they do not take a specific role, and therefore find it hard to find friends who match them. But from what I saw, being both a fan and a diva is just a stage, and they usually transform into something else, healthier.

When those two kinds of Eurovision fans interact, they just complete each other. It's a system that feeds itself, as I said earlier. Some fans are becoming attention-attracting divas, while the others adore them, seek their companion and attention and get inspiration and indirect satisfaction for their needs. But conflicts can still arise. They arise where there are several extraverted people who all want the attention and liking of everyone at the same time, but know that there can only be one winner, one diva (Eurovision, remember?). That's usually a situation that happens in the local fan communities of Eurovision, where fans are meeting each other often, and everybody knows everybody. Many Eurovision fans lose interest in the Eurovision scene just because of this  - they are becoming tired of this attention-seeking and drama-distributing atmpsphere and decide just to take a break.

But this phenomena just doesn't happen with abroad Eurovision-fans: people you rarely meet and who are easier to like due to the fact that their different cultural behaviour may be interpreted as a lack of conflicts and lack of oddness. Another thing that Peter, our little Eurovision fan, might saw when he watched Eurovision, is how attractive everything looks when it lacks your own cultural filter. You know your own nation and its roles and laws for what is accepted and what's popular. But you don't have this natural sense with people from abroad, and they don't have it in relation to you. That's what make them accept you, and that's what make you accept them. At least when it all starts.

And that's what makes the Eurovision week - the big event, the diamond and the pearl of the Eurovision crown - be as attractive as hell for the fans, artists, and everyone who is an illusion seeker. Watching Eurovision gives you a hope, a dream, a relief from the cruel boring world you live in. Mingling with the local Eurovision society gives you an opportunity to build yourself upon satisfying some of your needs. But the Eurovision week? it makes all of those dreams and wishes come true. Immidiately.

And about this I'll talk on the next and final part of the article.

Friday, May 6, 2011

I'm trying to find an answer to the million-dollar question of Eurovision: Why do some people become fans?

I remember being 16 and thinking to myself: how lucky I am, to be a fan of the Eurovision Song contest. This way I avoid all the usual adolescence conflicts about wanting to belong. I don't need to belong, because I already belong to the greatest thing ever - the group of Eurovision fans. I know fans from all over the world and I meet fans from Israel on a regular basis. We all have the same interests and desires, we all have similar personality traits, and we all follow the national finals through the Eurovision perioud and count the days till the Eurovision night (yeah, then it was only one final and one night).

So I felt lucky. On some dates I even felt luckier, because I felt an even greater sense of belonging. The day when the draw for performance order for Eurovision 2000 was exposed, for example. I remember printing the page with all the country names and carrying it to school in my wallet, taking it out at reccess time and looking at it, feeling proud to be a part. Feeling proud to be interested in this contest together with all those other people. I remember seeing "the Eurovision Preview" appearing on the TV guide and then walking around so happy for a whole week, because I had a once-in-a-year event to wait for. And I knew that there were others who looked forward for this together with me.

Years passed and I grew up. As the world of internet developed, I got to take part in internet groups dedicated to Eurovision, to know more and more fans, and to even travel to the Eurovision Song Contest. Twice. I also happened, as it is with many fans, to loose interest in the contest at some point. I came to despise it for a while and stop following it, and then realized that it will always be a part of me. So I returned to like it, but this time in a more mature way, and with new insights. In all those years of sticking to Eurovision or going away from it, one question never left me: Why? Why am I, and more people, are attracted to this contest and are choosing to follow it obsessively every year, from the moment the hosting city is announced, till the very final and sad moment when the stage is taken apart?

This is a common question and many other fans also tried to find an answer to it. Through the years, I got to hear all kinds of fan-explenations. The most common explanation ties Eurovision with the gay community. It claims that Eurovision is popular among the gays because it's all about show and glam and extravasion, and that's what gays like. I'm not gonna say that there's nothing true in this explanation, because everybody knows that Eurovision really has to do a lot with gays, and that if you meet a male Eurovision fan, there's 99% precent he's gay, and that Eurovision male artists are always gays so ESC female-fans should never make themselves look stupid and fall in love with them. But this theory does not explain WHY do gays love show and glam and everything that shines, neither does it explain why some gays DO NOT find Eurovision attractive, and it also does not explain what attracts female fans to the contest. And no, Eurovision is not a feminine event, as one female fan tried once to explain the fact that only girls & gays like it. The girls who like Eurovision are usually very special and not typical women or typical in any other respect.

Due to the fact that no one managed to explain in a reasonable way the phenomena of Eurovision fandom, I tried to dig deeper into my brain and find an answer all by myself. I came to many theories, and I keep coming up with new explenations and interpretations as I get to know the world of Eurovision better with each and every Eurovision year. Still, I have many holes in my theories, and therefore I thought it would be good to make them written and let others read them and raise new ideas.

My first-ever theory relating to Eurovision fans is called "The theory of Divas & Gays". In contrast to what it may sound, it's not about sexual preference at all, but about types of personality. I met a lot of Eurovision fans through the years and came to a conclusion that the Eurovision society has a main theme of admiration and worshiping. I noticed two types of people in this society, two types that you rarely find in other social groups. The first type I called "The gay". The "gay" is nice, social and friendly. He never fights and never criticises, but he's also a little bit shy, insecure, needy and premature and therefore needs a strong figure to extract power from. This power becomes available to him by means of the second personality type, "The Diva". The "diva", as you can understand, is a dominant figure who is also a big attention-seeker. She needs the spotlight on her face and body 24-hours a day. She believes that there's no "bad" or "good" attention, only...attention. And she'd do anything in order to be noticed. She fights, she says unaccepted things, she dresses provocatively or just strange and she even literaly asks people to give her attention and love her. She also needs a big group of "fans" around her.

The "Diva", as one can expect, attracts "Gays". And the diva and the gays feed each other's needs. The gays talk to the diva, give her compliments on her clothes and good-looks, and follow her movements in order to be inspired and impressed. The Diva, in return, gives them...the chance to be close to her and be inspired. Sometimes a very strange thing happens: the "gays" need to admire more than the "diva" needs to be admired. Then you can see how the gays create their own divas, divas that have never even nominated themeselves to be divas. It is done, for example, by spreading over-excitement around a new member that is joining the ESC fans community and by talking all day-long about his good traits and how he's different from all the rest. The gays are also in charge of crowning new divas and dissmissing the old ones. And it keeps happening all the time, because there can only be one diva. Therefore, when a new one is coming, the old one is automaticly loosing her honour and needs to find new tricks in order to draw attention all over again.

As it seems at first glance, the "diva" is a lucky figure who gets to be a queen and boost her self-esteem, but the game really belongs to the "gays". They may worship another and abandon their self-respect in order to glorify someone else, but they do it because they enjoy it and need it. Besides, without their glorification the diva does not exist. I may add that The "gay" does not need to be really gay. He can also be straight, but I called him "gay" due to the phenomena of many gays liking strong dominant idols like Celine dion or Lady gaga. The "diva" too, does not need to be a woman, even though she usually is.

And what does it have to do with Eurovision? Well, Eurovision is also about worshiping, crowning queens and then throwing them away to the garbage after typical 15 minutes. Every year we ESC fans have national finals who present new songs and new performers to our ears and eyes. When a certain preselection takes place, all the fans are watching it and are choosing their favorites. Wait, "choosing" may not be the right word - it's more like focusing on a prey and catching it with both hands. "Wowwwwww what an amazing song! It's the best song I heard in years in this contest!!!" "If it wins this final, it surely wins in Eurovision also!!!!" That's a common reaction. And you may not forget that we are not talking about masterpieces, but about three-minutes songs which usually have bad lyrics and a too-catchy form. And the fans know it. And still, the favorites are over-glorified. And then, when a favorite does not win, it's automaticly forgotten. Because it's time to move on to the next national-final and choose a new favorite. Maybe a few months later, when people would want to remember old songs that didn't make it to Eurovision - unfortunately - that song's name would be mentioned, like a name of an old beloved king in the books of history, which didn't make it because other, crueler and stronger kings, made it instead.

And then we have Eurovision itself. And it's winner which is forgotten exactly a second after Eurovision is over. And we also have the host country, who is a queen for a whole year, and its fan-citizens feel so proud. But then they are abandoned as soon as the new winner in announced, and their country reaches one-before-last place, as if last year's victory just meant nothing. It's also the same with Eurovision artists. They are also heroes for 15 minutes, or for a whole week of rehearsals. They can be nothing at all in their mother-land but now everybodey are taking pictures of them and want their authograf or want to hear things that they say, mostly in bad english, at the press conferences. But a day after Eurovision, or maybe even a day after they didn't make it to the final, they are gone. Mentaly and also physicly, because they usually fly back home and can't bare it to stay near the Eurovision atmosphere after they are already not a part of the game.

Eurovision fans, in my opinion, has something to do with worshiping - and with the other extreme edge - abandoning. That's why they are attracted to the Eurovision Song Contest, which uses-and-throws away artists even  faster then viewers of reality shows abadnon their season-winners. It happens so quicly that it's almost absurd.

This was my first theory. It has some logic, hasn't it? It explains what fans and their beloved Eurovision has in common better than the "gays love glam" theory, in my opinion. But still, I felt that it lacked something. Because it does not explain why, at the first place, Eurovision fans need to exercise worshiping and casting away so much. And so came my second theory.

My second theory is called "The attention deficit theory". I came up with it after I noticed that many Eurovision fans has an attention deficit - ADD or ADHD but mostly the first one. Having an attention deficites explains first the fact that ESC fans almost always become devoted fans: It's well-known that an ADD person just cannot concentrate when something does not interest him. On the other hand, he finds it super-easy to lose himself completely for something when he IS interested and attracted. Eurovision fans are among the most devoted fans that exist in this world. When fans of singers and bands, for example, meet, there's always the one who's more devoted than the others. But in the Eurovision world, almost everyone is obsessive. Almost 50% of the fans (if not more) go on a Eurovision-trip every year, and you may bear it in mind that it's a trip that costs a fortune: Tickets to three shows, hotel rooms, flights, food, shopping and more. But it does not look crazy for them (or should I say us), to work all year long and save money only to finance Eurovision expenses, and then go and take a flight and follow it, wherever it may be held, north, south, east or west of Europe.

But let's take a look at Eurovision itself - isn't it the greatest event for attention deficits? It's a contest of short songs that end just a moment after they've started, so that everybody can concentrate and listen to them without falling asleep. It's clearly the opposite of classical music pieces which take so much attention and patience - a torture for the typical ESC fan, even though there are some fans who do like classical music too. Apart for the lengh issue, the songs are all about catching an immidiate attention. You don't have to listen to them a few times in order to like them. One time is enough in order to digest them well and understand them, maybe also in order to learn the melody by heart. And they are not only simple - they are also very remarkable. The opening is always something you remember, whether it's a simple a-capella solo voice, or a bombastic drum-rolls sound with full orchestra. The name of the game is "standing out" and "being remembered". The performance itself also stays in the same style of becoming bold - there's always a gimmic, even though the gimmic can be as simple as "I'm standing on an empty stage with only my guitar". The clothes and stage customs are also always remarkable - and it does not necessarily mean beautiful. It can also be very ugly and pointless, like Lydia's pride-flag from spain 1999, but it's still very memorable.

Anyone with an attention deficite knows how it's boring and impossible to keep on doing the same thing. An attention-deficited person must always start new things, or start old things all over again, from the start, because people with attention deficite just like to start. A start is when you still think you can make it right, before your impatience is ruining everything again and making a not-perfect result. And so it is with Eurovision. It erases itself every year and starts all over again. Preselection is following preselection. and the rollercoaster ride is so fast and you get to like a new song almost every day. You can also rank the 40 or so songs in a whole different way every day and have a completely new top 10 and it would still be okay and acceptable in the ESC world. It's changing and it's as dynamic as hell.

So to sum up, Eurovision is a contest, and therefore the emphasis is on memorability and standing out, and that may be what makes those people, who like it catchy and simple and fast-food like, to be so attracted to it.

I bet you can see, too, the many similar lines and meeting-points between those two theories of mine. Both explain why Eurovision, with its bold, memorable and catchy features, is attracting certain kinds of fans. But each one of thise theories is giving only one angle of the picture, but not the whole painting in it's frame as it's hanged on the wall and everything. And this is why I came up with the third theory, which is also the latest and therefore not so formulised. I don't have a catchy name for it yet, but it has to do with something that both "gays", "divas" or people who find it hard to concentrate has in common. And about this I'm going to tell on part two of this so-called "article".

Read the second part of this article here!

Friday, April 8, 2011

ESC 2011 one-song-at-a-time: Lithuania



There are certain things which are really painful to watch at. A beautiful song being destroyed is one of them. Lithuania's entry this year is just such a case. It's also a good example for what can happen to whoever wishes to write songs "especially for Eurovision". But before I start with my critcs, I have to declare: I adore C'est ma vie. I oved it from the very first time I listened to it, and I still do now. The opening tones make me cry inside every time I hear them, and the lady's voice is just..so rich and charming. Well, she Is a jazz singer after all. And still, some negative comments must also be said about this song.

Here's the story of the creation of Lithuania's entry to Eurovision 2011, as I see it. One lithuanian composer, let's call him Paulius, was a talented musician who liked musicals and grandiose tones that makes your heart swell and your soul melt. He started composing a beautiful sorrowful and dramatic melody with sad minor chords to accompany it...

But then he suddenly remembered it's Eurovision we are talking about, not some musical on a big tour. In order to make the song more catchy and easly-digested by Eurovision viewers, he caled his friend Zdanavičius, who was a devoted Eurovision watcher, in order to compose a decent chorus. Lovely Zdanavičius made himself a cup of coffee. Then he oppened his French dictionary and chose a typical Eurovision phrase - C'est la vie. Then he felt it was too much banal, so he added a little interest by changing the "la" into "ma". The genious then set it into a boring and easy-to-remember melody which every single listener in the whole world would feel like he's heard it before. Somewhere. A few cheap drum effects were addad in order to dramaticize, and then he ended everything with a big last Eurovisionish last "c'est ma vie" with full orchestra. Bravo.

This was what Zdanavičius did. Yeah, I know that all of the information sites say that this song was composed by one Paulius Zdanavičius, but I am convinced. This song could not be written by one person. It sounds like two parts which have been pasted together due to an unfortunate injustice. This song starts so beautifully. the piano opening and the sadness it reflects just melt my heart. The melody of the verses is just so NOT typical and lame, but unconventional and special and combines both sorrow and optimism. The chorus, on the other hand, is awful. It gave the song its title, which is the lowest a Eurovision song can go. C'est ma vie? really! What's next? Voules-vous? Veni vidi vici? A stupid eurovisionary attempt at internationality and multy-linguality, which we fans hate, and them - Eurovision watchers - simply laugh at. And the too-much-drama effect of drum rolls just destroy the worderful quiet ambience that was created at the start with the piano. As the song proceeds, the piano disapears and the playback becomes ugly and traying-too-hard.

Additional things I hate in this song, because they just ruin its huge potential:

1. The singer's dress. What's that?! Does she HAVE to wear two skirts, the lower one black and apparent bellow the transperant upper one?

2. The singer's accent. Am I just imagining it, or all Eastern-European singers has a very strange way of pronouncing the sound "sh", especially when it comes in the word "shine"?

And still - I see hope for this song. This is an only ballad in its semi final, and quite a catchy one. what could go wrong when you get those splendid conditions? Even the worst ballad in the whole world would do well in a situation like this one, and this one is so far from being the worst of all. Even though it is a praise-the-Eurovision song and ends like a sad cliche, it still starts amazingly good. And isn't that all that matters when it comes to Eurovision?  






















(In these pictures: Evelina Sašenko, representative of Lithuania, from various sites on the net)

Monday, April 4, 2011

ESC 2011 one-song-at-a-time: Belarus



Patriotism is attractive.

And its message is easily shining through when it's said clear and simply. When I first listened to "I love Belarus", the thing that first cought my attention was not the worn-out folk elements or typical simple and also worn-out melody. What made me actually pay attention to this song and not press the "next" button, as I usually do when encountering over-formulized songs, was the line "I love Belarus". It came right at the start of the chorus, clearly and powerfully sung, almost shouted out loud by Anastasiya Vinnikova and her vocalists, shining through and spreading warm feelings of belonging to one's country, land and nation. Just a simple one sentence, and still, powerfull because of its straightforwardness. A simple phrase that can elicit so many images and thoughts in one's mind.

I recently found out that Belarus also had a non-entry. As you all might already know, they had a former entry named "Born in Belarus" by the same singer, which was disqualified because the song was released and published before the allowed ESC date:


I think they were quite smart in Belarus, when they decided to keep the same theme and write a new song with the same spirit of love to their country. Lyrics almost never really matter when it comes to Eurovision, but I think that this case is an exception, and I want to believe than the song writter or composer knew that and did that on purpose. Anyway, I'm so happy they used this opportunity in order to improve a existing song instead of taking a chance and creating something completely new. Instead of a boring strange song with awkward performance like they formerly had, now we got a powerfully-arranged and straight-forward entry which is so much better, and that's such a big luck.

If relating to the lyrics, the case of Belarus 2011 is, as I said, an ESC exception. But maybe it isn't. Because I cannot really decide if the song;s maguc is all about lyrics, or all about theme. If we take a closer look at the lyrics, we discover a usual dull text which could be also interpreted as a love song that was written in 5 minutes - typical Eurovision. A nice exceptional line is maybe "I'm feeling great and it's easy to be strong, when all the hearts keep on beating as one" - again, So typical Eurovision to put effort only in the very beggining in order to catch the listener's attention. So on the whole, this song, like many other songs in Eurovision, is about NOTHING.

But, and that's a big but, the fact that there is one very strong line like "I love Belarus", which is brought forward so clearly, turns it from nothing into everything. When I hear "I love Belarus", I imagine immediately a song about a connection, a song about a country with a hard past and hope for the future, a song about being simple and still proud. It doesn't even matter that all of this is not written and said in the song at all. But since the watchers of Eurovision are not going to catch the rest of the lyrics anyway (with the exception of native English speakers) - they could maybe "hear" the eco of the associations mentioned above instead.

Now, let's take a look at the music also. As I said at the start of this post, I don't think this song has anything special in it's melody, not to speak about the harmony which is just SO boring. But it has a very good arrangment and playback. It reflects power, and its constant beat and rythm, together with the Belarus theme, make it sound a little bit like a national anthem in remix. Which is good. Very good and highten it's chances in Eurovision, because a simple message is so important, and here we get it in it's simplest form wrapped in a gleaming package. The folk elements are SO Eurovision and give the impression of "okay, didn't we hear that already, million of times before in each and every second song from East Europe?" But it seems like Eurovision fans stay always hungry for folk tunes, no matter how second-hand and banal they would be (judging by the excitment over Dana International's April fool version to ding-dong which supposedly had a cut-and-pasted bagpipes melody in its opening.

Performance? I'm hoping for a typical eastern-european pefrormance, and by this I mean a good performance with a lot of effort put and a lot of sex-appeal and dancers and fun. The best would be if they keep the folk dancers from the video clip and add a sexy Anny-Lorak-touch to them. I am very happy to know that Belarus is not in charge of the shootings for her own song in Eurovision, because if to judge by the youtube performance of their non-entry and the occasional enthusiastic-girl close-ups from the audience, they are not so good in making a performance looking attractive on the screen. The video clip is, on the other hand, completely fine, like it's usualy with those countries that do not hold a glamorous preselection, but then put a lot of effort in improving the winning / chosen entry.

I personally think that Belarus has a song that could really surprise and give a fight. Now it's a source for disrespect and it's quite ignored, but a growing number of fans who claim that "they know that it's obviously not a quality song, but still can't help liking it" makes me feel quite sure that it's simplicity and frankness would help it go very far.






























(In these pictures: Anastasiya Vinnikova, from www.songcontest.ru)

A preview for my review

Rankings are so boring. Eurovision fans, mostly, but not only them - practicly anyone who's into music and charts, are obsessed with making a top 5, top 10 or top 30 of their all-times best, or a top-something with some special theme - best of this or that artist, for example. I, personaly, like to make a rank and hate it at the same time. I like it - because it's nice to arrange everything in your head and decide once and for all what you like and what you do not like. I thinks that psychological research could be done about the fact that making a rank contribute to one's definition of personality.

But I hate ranks because of two reasons. For the first, I don't think it's really possible to decide that one song is better than the other (totally contradicts the purpose and vision of the Eurovision Song Contest, but let's ignore it right now). For the second, I think that putting song titlesor entries into a list diminish a little bit from every song's individuality and character. When you see a list of ranked songs, you only see who is "better" and "liked", and who is "worse" or "not popular". You cannot see which song has good lyrics but boring melody, you cannot see which song has a great orchestration and developement and therefore is appreciated, you cannot see which singer is a good performer and which singer has an amasing hit but is a disaster on stage, amd so on. Those things are practicly not mentioned when Eurovision fans rank the songs. This is why I prefer deep reviews over tops and charts. 

And this is why I decided to make a very extended review of this year's Eurovision songs. Since we, Eurovision fans, all have some attention deficit (haha, my own conclusion, due to the fact that we all adore a contest with straight-to-the-point songs which last only 3 minutes) I'm gonna cut it into many many pieces and review one song at a time. In contrast to what everyone keep saying, I think this year is a wonderful great year, and every song is worth reference. I started downloading the songs and listening to them only about a month ago, and instantly loved most of them. Maybe that's due to the fact that I was not following the preselections (except of Melodifestivalen) and couldn't take the actual performance into consideration, but I don't really care. In contrast to many Eurovision fans, I've always been there mainly for the music rather than for the show. 

So from now on, as said, once in a while I'm gonna take one song from the contest and bring it into the spotlight for 15 seconds of fame and review, while relating to other aspects than "I like it" "I don't" and "I think it's gonna do well". Who's gonna be the first entry, I wonder...   


 
 










(In these pictures: Nostalgic Eurovision logos through the years, by SeekLogo.com)

Friday, April 1, 2011

Eurovision spirit, Eurovision soul

I am starting to feel it in the air the moment passover is arriving and spring is coming - the energetic atmosphere of Eurovision. The wonderful sensation of knowing that the tension is starting to build up. You've been following the preselections every week, listening to the new songs on your ipod all of those days, loading yourself with ESC excitment. Now all songs are known. And now there are so many joyful things and events ahead: the festive TV broadcast of the songs and their video clips, which is really the opening shot of the official Eurovision month. Then the final bets, the OGAE parties and meetings, everything is about Eurovision and all the fans are a big happy, excited and histerical family.

And then...the event itself. You ordered a flight, arranged an accomodation and then you fly. There, in the host city, you'll meet all of your Eurovision friends. And how joyful this is going to be...you meet then only once a year. but feel like you share with them some part of your soul. You are all celebrating the same great holiday and plan your lives around it, isn't it so? This week is going to be crazy, hazy, glamorous and terrific week of rehearsals, parties, exciting meetings, conversations and picture-taking and mingling with the artists, a big rush that gets bigger ang bigger untill the day of the final, when we all sit somewhere: in the venue, the green room, press room, in a bar watching it on a big screen with beer...it doesn't really matter as long as you've got a good place. We all would hold our breath waiting for the final results. Hoping to see our favorites go high and our home country getting a respectable position. everything happens so fast as we sit fastened to our chair and follow the scoring. And then it's gone before we even notice. The Eurovision Song Contest is over. We know the winner, we know where we''ll all meet next year. God, a whole year to go untill the next time!

And then, a last party. The winning song is repeated again and again and everybody is dancing like mad. Then tearful packing. Taking your laggage to the airport through the city streets that all of a sudden seem a little bit empty and quiet without all this Eurovision atmosphere. A little bit sad. And then your flight home. Later, when you're back in your country and back in your routine of work, you'll feel some emptiness - Post Eurovision Depression, they call it. But it will pass, and you would be able to live your life just like before, knowimg that next year this whole fansastic race will start all over again...

Those are our lives, Eurovision addicts. We all have this Eurovision rush in our blood and an extreme liking for those gleaming things that attract immediately and then are gone in 60 seconds. A Eurovision song that lasts only for one year, before it's stored up there, in the huge attick of past ESC songs. A show that lasts only 3 minutes and then go on living only in Youtube and DVD's. A singer who's a superstar surrounded by fans only for the one week of Eurovision, unless he wins. A fan that is living a boring meaningless life, who gets a refreshing wave of energy as the ESC times are getting closer and suddenly there is so much to do and to arrange. This is what we all are. Temporarity addicts. We are temporary. And we die and reborn. Every year we die in may, but come back to life just in time for the first national preselection...

But now it's happy, shiny Eurovision times. Today, on my way to work, it felt like the first day of spring. The weather was so fine, the sun was shining and made me take off my cardigan, and the wind brought the smell of bloom and freshness. Those sensations always reminds me that a great perioud is coming. Spring brings a lot of good things, and Eurovision is only one of them.

And now for a little souvenir - some pictures from last year's Eurovision in Oslo. I went as a representative of Tapuz - Israel's biggest portal, and my friend Shira came to represent her fashion and styling website. Even only looking at those pictures makes me long so much and miss those wonderful days we spent there, in the streets of great, noble and beautiful Oslo.














































Picture codes:

1. The welcoming Eurovision decoration at the airport. 2. The venue - Telenor Arena. We've been visiting it almost every day till if felt like home. 3. A car with the ESC 2010 slogan "Share the moment", that played all times ESC hits in the street. 4. Me with Feminnem, the croatian representatives, at the Croatian party at the embassy. 5. Me with Giorgos, the Greek singer, at the Greek party. 6-7. A little big from the beauty of Norway. It was really breath-taking. 8. Me and the Polish singer, Marcin Marozinski at the opening coctail. 9. Me and Shira at the official opening coctail.10. Me and Shira at the Greek party.

(Pictures taken in Oslo, Norway. Summer 2010)

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Stupid people vote for wrong songs

What can be worse than a bad song? A bad song performed by a very famous singer. Dana International, for example, who won the Israeli preselection for ESC a few moments ago with one of the most casual and boring songs ever. As expected. Yeah, it's no news that everyone expected her to win. Her name is much too big in Israel to be ignored, at least when it comes to Eurovision affairs. Whenever she choses to nominate herself, she's almost automaticly made a winner, like her mere participation pushes the button of "selected". We've had the same thing before.

It also happened two years ago, when she wrote a song for Boaz Mauda's internal preselection and won. Well, yes. Many would say that in the end her "election" was all for the good, because Boaz and his song reached a good result. But who knows? The other songs in his preselection might have taken him into an even better position. One thing is for sure: Boaz reached a good position in ESC because he's a great performer who felt connected to the song. Not because Dana wrote it. The problem is that the public in Israel believes in the latter.

I think it's almost like believing in charms and magic. No person is a mascot for Eurovision. Not even Johny Logan. I am entertaining myself with the thought of her not having success in ESC this time. Of course I want my country to succeed, but a result which is not top 10 will prevent a future Dana dictature in everything that concerns ESC in Israel.

If to relate to the Kdam in general, I think it was quite a shameful event. The presenters - beautiful talented ex-Eurovision participant Shiri Mimon and Actor Aki Avni seemed to improvise their texts rather than to come up with something ready and witty, as required. Sometimes it worked, and sometimes it just looked embaressing and improffessional. The sound quality was horrible and ruined some songs completely. The postcards were, again, improvised - something that worked well for artists with charizma and good camera attitude, and worked very horribly for artists who are not especially inteligent or talkative. The only good thing was the songs. I was really surprised by the wide selection, and the level of modernity that characterizedm them. Not that it matters, after the worst and most boring and old-fashioned song of the ten was chosen.

Traveling to Dusseldorf is starting to seem less and less attractive for me now. Everybody knows how good it feels to be present at the event when your country has a good song that everybody like. And everybody knows how pointless it feels to travel all the way to the host country and not be able to support your country because it happened to choose a bad song by apparently giving power to the stupid population who knows nothing about music.

Now Sweden is my only hope. If my favorite country has a good song, or at least a song I can live with, I would be more than satisfied and may be ready to ignore my bitter Dana-feelings. For my part, it means that Linda Bengtzing should be chosen, or at least Swingfly or the playtones, who are also frequent stars in my playlist.

You know what? I could also live with Sanna as a representative of Sweden. I don't like her song, but she's been trying for so many years, and most of her entries in the past were excelent. Besides, she can turn shit into gold, as a friend of mine said, because she's such a great performer. It doesn't really matters with what song she's coming. So Sanna will also be okay with me. But please, just don't let Brolle or The Moniker or some other song that will take all the fun out of Eurovision for me be chosen. That's selfish of me, I know. But aren't we all?

(Posted in my old blog on 8/3/2011)

About Eurovision songs which get translated to English and Linda Bengtzing's dishwashing machine

What is the official language of Eurovision? Yes, of course, it's English. But a very special kind of English. Let's call it the Eurovision Dialect. It's characterized by the use of low-level language and a very simple wording in the best case, and gramatical errors blended with phrases literaly translated from one's native language, at the worst case. The reason for this mess is derived from a very obvious fact - only 3 out of the many countries of Eurovision have English as a native language. The rest have other languages from a variety of origins and groups, and this, as so many peoplesay, is what makes Eurovision such an interesting and rich music event.

But does it, really? Because as we all know, most coutries go on choosing English as the main language for their representing songs. I will not talk about the banal issue of "countries should sing in their own language because it enriches Eurovision". I'll take a different angel of the problem, and it's the consistant lowering of quality when text writers, singers and countries choose to express themselves musicaly in English.
I'll start with a personal example. I speak 3 languages: Hebrew, my native language. English - the first language I learned at school. And Swedish - a language I chose to study one year ago because of interest in some music contest called Melodifestivalen you might haven't heard about.

I'm a very different person while using the three different languages. In Hebrew I'm fluent and therefore can express myself freely acording to my level of education or inteligence. In English I'm quite trained, and therefore also fluent, but make occasional mistakes and cannot speak about higher issues. In Swedish I'm becoming a very quiet person who'd rather listen than speak, and when I do speak, it can only be done in a very simple and basic way. If I wanted to express myself through some art medium, what language would I choose if I wanted to get a respectable result?

Ofcourse, there's the issue of internationality. If you send a song in English, it hightens the chances for people to understand the song and to relate to it, and therefore get more points. But we forget that English is hardly the native language of anyone in Eurovision. So yes, a song in English might sound more up-to-date and more international, but the final product is often one of a very low quality. And the worst thing is, that we even cannot detect each others mistakes, because non of us is a native English speaker! And so we, inteligent and nice people who love Eurovision, end up praising songs that we would have never liked if they were sung in our native language. Otherwise we would be able to see immidiately how stupid they are, and detest them automaticly.

A good example for this is given by Jonas Gardell in Melodifestivalen 2003. I assume you all already know it. But the part about the Estonian presenters shows how something that might sound not so witty but still okay in English, is exposed in its great stupidity while translated to your native language:


Even worse is the opposite phenomena: Songs written originaly in the local language, who later earn a translation to English when they win the preselection and go to Eurovision. The deterioration in quality that follows is almost heart breaking. A good example for this comes from my own country's national final this year. Most of the songs contain unfortunately some lines in English - a lame common side effect of ESC songs. One song, sung by Adi Cohen, a very good singer and idol participant, proves perfectly what happens when a song is translated.

The title of the song in English is "just abot love". Sounds bad and wrongly translated. It IS wrongly translated, actually, as it should have been "solely about love", if they would want a same-level synonym. But what's really interesting is the transition from Hebrew to English at the second part of the song. The first part, in Hebrew, is quite ok for a ESC song. Listen to it here:


I'll translate the Hebrew part literaly for you to understand:
 
My life are calling me to go on and advance
To discover new locations even though I'm without you now
A place where I could live, a place free of worries
 
Quite acceptabe lyrics, I think. But than, after the first chorus, it transforms into English, and a horrifying scene of cliches is taking place:
 
Why do  people be so cruel and start to fight
I have no answer to a thousand stars at night
Why do you run when love is here?
 
Now it has become a call-for-peace song with lines that are both recycling older lines from other ESC songs, and are also kind of making no sense. And I ask - why???? ahy not keep it in Hebrew and let people use their imagination in trying to figure out what is it about?

What brings me to the third example. The main two languages of the music I am listening to are Swedish and Finnish. I understand the lyrics of most of the Swedish songs (unless it's Håkan Hellström, then I need to use the dictionary a little bit) but I didn't know even one word in Finnish untill recently. This is why Finnish music always sounded to me very mysterious and deep, even when it was all about pop songs. But now I've been studying Finnish for a month or so, and I am starting to change my perspective. In only 4 lessons, we covered almost 90% of the words I could recognize from Finnish songs. I wonder, does it mean that music always utilizes the lowest level of the language? Or does it only mean that I listen to songs with a very low level of vocabulary? :-)

I'll end this post with a desperate request. If, and if Linda Bengtzing wins Melodifestivalen. Please don't let her song be translated to English. I don't really think I would be able like it anymore if she's going to sing "He can even take out the dishes out of the dish washing machine".

(Posted in my old blog on 3/3/2011)

Why do Eurovision Song Contest fans just LOVE comebacks?

The excitement over Dino Merlin's selection to represent Bosnia-Herzegovina made me wonder a little bit. Why a singer who happened to be part of the duo that represented Bosnia in 1999, and is coming back to compete again, is such a big deal?

Well, you can claim, ofcourse, that it's because he had a great song back then, or because he reached a very good place. You can also say that it's exciting because he's a familiar character to Eurovision fans, his music must have competed in various internal fan-initiated contests online and it will be nice to see him again. I personally think that it's not the whole story. That's because excitment, as we all know, is also elicited when an artist who's done very bad is coming back to compete in the contest or its many many national finals. Which makes me ask: What is it, that make Eurovision Song Contest fans care so much about comebacks, whether good or bad?

The answer, in my opinion, has to do with facebook. Not the application itself, but it's general spirit. In a way, I think that we all see the artists and performers of ESC not as our idols, but as our friends. Come on, we know everything about them! We know if they were a big success in their home land and were send to ESC as means of developing their international career, or otherwise, if they were totally unknown and were chosen only because they won a national final in a country were esc is quite an uninteresting issue.  We know whether they are favorites or not, we know the specific point in their show where their voice shuddered or where they've been completely out of pitch. We know whether they made a respectable show at the contest, or whether they had no awareness whatsoever of what's "in" by using strange gimmicks or irrelevant outfits. When the calendar shows May, and they all become gleaming stars for 15 seconds (or for a whole week of rehearsals), it's only us who know who they really are.

That's the reason for why coming back to Eurovision, entering the ring again, has, in my opinion, a certain facebook effect that lets us, the fans, peep into their life again. See who changed hairstyle or even his whole image, see who stayed beautiful even though the many years that has passed. See who is going to make a success after he failed for the last time, and who's gonna fail even though he reached second a couple of years ago. It's just as fun as discovering what happened to the most popular girl in school or feeling happy for the outcasts who turned into a success story. And just like as it is in life - the biggest the time gap between their participations, the higher the interest rises.  

And what about satellites-Lena, then? Not so many people seem happy about her comeback. And why would they be? She's just like this person who's updating his facebook status 24 times a day, with her coming back just a year after she won, as if her hunger is never satisfied. And still, even considering this specific comeback, it's gonna be very interesting to look at the final results.  

(Posted in my old blog on 23/2/2011)

I just love a fresh start

Starts are always fresh and bright and clean, aren't they?








(Pictures taken in Bergshamra, Sweden. Fall 2010)